Test E/ EQ too long?

[NYRugby]

Ok I'm on my second cycle. First one was susta / deca for 14 weeks and I got AWESOME gains. This time I decided to do 600 test E and 500 EQ. I planned on 15 weeks EQ 16 test E. Is this too long? I've been told you need ot be on EQ at least 15 for results?

[BIG D]

Looks good to me

[Titan]

I personally like running a similar cycle to that for 18-22 wks. Nice lean gains, and the EQ for me usually shows good results at wk 10-14. What you have sounds good, but you could extend it up to 22 wks.

[jww]

I dont think 15 weeks is to long for the Eq but the test be ready to come off it slower then just one last shot ween your shots down in mg to where you dont shock your system and have a good pct ready

[shoalin]

Originally Posted by NYRugby

Ok I'm on my second cycle. First one was susta / deca for 14 weeks and I got AWESOME gains. This time I decided to do 600 test E and 500 EQ. I planned on 15 weeks EQ 16 test E. Is this too long? I've been told you need ot be on EQ at least 15 for results?

If your just starting out I'd stick to 12 weeks for the EQ and 14 for the test. Some people would end the EQ 2 weeks before their cycle ended

1-14 500 test E
1-12 600 EQ

[EnhancedGenetix]

yeah i like his cycle idea better, generally EQ stays in your system longer. so you stay on the test while the EQ esters are still clearing. and since its your second cycle i would only run 500mg of test e. also, imo, you need at least 600mg of EQ for 12 weeks to see any results. so i second shoalin's post

[jdjack]

If you can.. Do the 15wks of eq and 17wks of test. No reason to have a weeks worth sitting around.

[sgtNoob]

Dont know about the test e, not going to say anything about it. But I can say that I have seen some great results off EQ, and I am only using 300-400mg per week on that one. The interesting thing is for the first 4 weeks I was using 400mg, the last 5 I have been using 300mg. Most of my weight gain has come in the last 3 weeks, and I have gained 17lbs so far without any sort of test at all.

I dont think that more is necessarily better when it comes to this compound. Just my opinion. It also seems that if you are adding test e to the mix, a lower base of EQ spread over a longer period (for a full 20 weeks) would be more beneficial than more EQ for a shorter period of 15 weeks as far as vascularity, leaner gains, etc. Personally, just from what I have seen this first time, I wouldnt start an EQ cycle that didnt run at LEAST 16 weeks. Just my personal preference.