Ironic? Just a thought on the New World Order.

[juice2k8]

The two most despised people in the world are running for president: A woman, and a black man.

If the country accepts this when Mr Obama comes to power, that would show the Elitists and the New World Order that we are ready to accept anything IMO. No wonder Mr Rockefeller is so ready to get this started, hes fucking 93 this year.

Now check this out. This is more than likely factual, and real and does not surprise me one bit. When the man leaked this evidence out, he was dead days later.

Project Blue Beam


They have the European Union in place and now the North American Union....all they need is the Asia Union and then they have the basic core of the one world government, then they will have their one world religion in place. This new "god" will be known as the Anti-Christ....."Even the most informed will be tempted" (the link above explains what I'm talking about)

When the RFID is put into our hands by trickery by our populations OWN DEMAND, the book of revelations will be fulfilled. Every person will be chipped since we will all be under the same rule by the same government. If we do not obey, they will turn off our chip. The only way to make any economic transaction is through that chip!


The Bilderberg meeting took place for the first time ever on US Soil early this month. The list of attendee's was leaked out. Now what's screwed up is some information was leaked out too.....

Everyone knows about the RFID chips they want to put in our hands, which would COMPLETELY FULFILL the book of revelations. The scary thing is, the country will DEMAND these.....they will not be forced........

The information that was leaked out, was that it will be 'for our safety' because there will apparently be terrorists in our country "blonde haired, blue eyed westerners"....or members of our own country.

The castrated media does not even find it news, that over 120 of the most POWERFUL PEOPLE in the WORLD are meeting in secret....what the fuck?!

Its actually a FELONY for any one member of government, to meet in private with another member of government because of the HIGH RISK OF CORRUPTION!!! (This is from the Logan Act)

Bill Clinton had a terrorist attack his first year in office (First WTC bombing).......new laws were passed that infringed peoples liberties. Then in 1995 the same thing happened again (The Oklahoma City Bombings)...again laws were passed that took away peoples individual freedoms and liberties under the false mask known as 'security and safety'.

George Bush had a terrorist attack his first year in office as well (9/11.)....new laws were passed and the constitution and bill of rights were DESTROYED as we know it, again, in the name of 'security'.

Who wants to bet that President Obama will have a terrorist attack hit him in the first year......My prediction is that it will be a Nuclear Missile or major bombing on a US City by a blonde haired, blue eyed non existent "spy" from Iran.

And the media will just eat it up. The propaganda machine will again tell the same lie OVER, and OVER, and people will BELIEVE IT...and support another false war and so will our children. They will enlist in the name of 'freedom' just to give their lives to be used as pawns of the elite.......

Again their answer will be global government......it was their answer in world war 1, it was the answer in world war 2, and this will trigger world war 3....

So what are we going to do about this? Why let it happen when we can stop it?????

[jpme]

.......uh huh.

[sparks1420]

i really dont think obama is going to win, i think this was just a distracion for a while to to bring mcain into office.. the nwo would want a republican in office to finish what has been started, granted obama has already met with bilderburg. and as far as some false flag alien operation a lot of speculation is its gonna be 2012 and i really think mcain is gonna win until hilary reruns then and then its hell on earth

[bigjesus]

i·ro·ny (r-n, r-)
n. pl. i·ro·nies
1.
a. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.
b. An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.
c. A literary style employing such contrasts for humorous or rhetorical effect. See Synonyms at wit1.
2.
a. Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs: "Hyde noted the irony of Ireland's copying the nation she most hated" Richard Kain.
b. An occurrence, result, or circumstance notable for such incongruity. See Usage Note at ironic.
3. Dramatic irony.
4. Socratic irony.

[juice2k8]

What I meant by irony is the two most unwanted people for president are going to be in charge. lol

Originally Posted by bigjesus

i·ro·ny (r-n, r-)
n. pl. i·ro·nies
1.
a. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.
b. An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.
c. A literary style employing such contrasts for humorous or rhetorical effect. See Synonyms at wit1.
2.
a. Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs: "Hyde noted the irony of Ireland's copying the nation she most hated" Richard Kain.
b. An occurrence, result, or circumstance notable for such incongruity. See Usage Note at ironic.
3. Dramatic irony.
4. Socratic irony.