| Anabolics Discussion FROM THIS POINT FORWARD, NO SOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS FORUM. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Anabolics Discussion FROM THIS POINT FORWARD, NO SOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS FORUM. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
So here's my question for the following arguement:
Lab X makes Test 250mg Lab Y makes Test 250mg An individual uses both products. With all else being equal, the individual says that Lab X was a much "better" product than Lab Y. So my question is, why would Lab X's product be better than Lab Y's product if they were both Test 250mg? My guess is because one is underdosed or overdosed. I ask because I've read countless threads where people say how "Awesome" or "Better" one lab's product is over anothers. Of course, logically, it should not make a difference. Or maybe logic just doesn't apply here...
__________________
-=E |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
with dosing set aside.. as you stated all else would be placebo effects. I would have to say that most develop a preference to an ester or such, but if all are even then it is probably left up to personal experiences or outside mitigating factors that influence their decision, Ie: changed diet while on brand X and really made gains, but when they used brand y they broke up with their girlfriend and just had a bad cycle, or their body was not ready or over trained. raws are raws, sterility could be one factor in making one brand better than the other.. etc. blah, blah
__________________
Ground not gained, is ground lost... Better to have and not need,: then need and not have
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
ive delt with that before, i think everything seems to effect it all, most people change their diets on cycle or dont do this or that. i also think how well they are filtered makes a huge difference. ive tried homebrewed vs. good UGL and the UGL always leaves me with better results in the side effects area.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i agree with fit4lyfe.. too many mitigating factors the user is subjected too |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's the dosing. Have both brands tested and brand X will be stronger.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
no im not sharp enough to homebrew, shit i can hardly make hamburger helper ronin!lol
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
As said all in the dosing.
And it could be that even the lab that has the "weaker" gear meant well, but his powder was not as pure, giving him in the end a weaker than label clamied dosage. If 2 different products have the SAME esters, dosage, etc, then they are they same...test, is test, is test....
__________________
I KNOW NOTHING! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good deal. Thanks for the input all!
Quote:
__________________
-=E |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
there is no difference if the raws are exactly the same purity and they are made exactly the same. its all about the purity of the raws and the math in the brewing.
__________________
you can either be one of the millions, or be one in a million. either way the choice is yours. LET ME MAKE THIS FUCKING REAL CLEAR, IF YOU PM ME FOR A SOURCE AND YOUR NEW AND I DON'T KNOW YOU, CONSIDER YOURSELF BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|