![]() |
|
|
Donate | |||||||
| Anabolics Discussion FROM THIS POINT FORWARD, NO SOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS FORUM. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Say you had 100% pure var that wasn't cut with anything and was pharm. grade, what is the lowest dose one could expect some decent gains. We all know 50mg ED is the norm but I'm talking about something on the side of 20-30mg.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a lot of experience with oxandrolone and unless you are female, you will not experience any benefit at that dosage. In my opinion 50 mg is still too little. It is expensive but 70-80mg ED is more effective.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
and you are talking about a cycle anchored with test, right?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't take a cycle without test as a base. Personally I think min. of var would be 50mg ED but a pretty respected board member suggested that all you really needed was 20-30 mg ED if it was pure.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was just checking
-Anavar toward the end of the cycle? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
End of the cycle, middle, kickstart hell even a bridge. Really just speaking in general.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
why is it always more is better? i used 40mgs e/d and was happy, maybe 50-60 max, but why anything over 60mgs a day?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats pretty much the basis of what this other poster was saying. I think a lot of people use a lot more gear than what they actually needed. If 30mg/ED worked why take twice that amt.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was thinking 40 and a test based run was the norm for our goals.
What is it with the "more is better" attitude? Guess you touched on it in another thread, rib- Good point though still |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
You'll see how your body works with the compound at 30 1Big- gotta figure out where you would place it in the scheme of things.
What is your goal? |
![]() |
![]() |